Functional requirements from the viewpoint of records management


Dr. Peter Toebak, 27. Juni 2002; 30.04.2004

Toebak Dokumenten Management und Archivierung GmbH

www.toebak.ch

1. Introduction

2. Basic distinctions between DMS and RMS

3. Records management and daily business

4. Capture and creation of incoming, internal and outgoing records

5. Records indexing, profiling and searching (evidential and information value)

6. Push and pull mechanisms for presentation and communication

7. Storage and life-cycle management

1. Introduction

Although there is some overlap between records management and document management, it has become clear that document management in itself cannot guarantee legal evidence, corporate accountability, internal and external auditing, security management and archival obligation, nor can it (in the long run) warrant for efficiency and innovation on a documentary basis. In fact, the best IT suppliers have already reacted to this development. RMS and DMS nowadays are converging more and more or add-ons for records management are delivered on top of DMS.

Records have to be created while doing business. They cannot be created afterwards or simply moved off-line onto less expensive storage media by a DMS standard "archiving" function. For their whole life cycle they must remain properly classified and organized. The most important feature of a RMS in fact is the establishment and maintenance of a "controlled and structured environment" in order to enable a company-wide life-cycle based management of all relevant business-process bound documents. Records must keep up their authenticity, reliabiltiy, integrity and usability as long as they are needed. Aspects such as business context, content and structure of the records are crucial here. Actions on records and files are to be recorded by means of metadata, reports and audit trails, from the date of creation until the date of disposal or archiving.

A company or administration must define which documents are considered as records. Principally this is a logical-organizational matter. It has to be clear which records are "normal records", "vital records" and "archival" or "non-archival records". "Vital records are those records that are absolutely necessary to the organisation's ability to continue its business either in terms of its ability to cope with emergency/disaster conditions or to protect its financial and legal interests" (MoReq, 2002, page 24). Criteria for record, vital record and archival record status have to be developed.

Some general remarks are produced in paragraphs 2 and 3. More specific functional requirements are presented in paragraphs 4-7. They have been categorized in four fields. A RMS must not be able to fulfil all mentioned requirements by itself. In this case it may not hamper fulfilment, e.g. by not supporting and incorporating the prescribed scanner soft- and hardware. Some requirements can only be fulfilled by an adequate logical metadata structure (the right metadata fields and references).

2. Basic distinctions between DMS and RMS

Typical requirements for electronic document management are:

Additional typical requirements for electronic records management are:

Source: http://www.pro.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/ (Office of the e-Envoy)

3. Records management and daily business

It is important that the tools for records management permit a combination of "help" and "control", e.g. through profile masks with pull-down menus and index lists and by means of a business classification scheme with incorporated retention or disposition schedule in the background. The RMS must be rigid enough to standardize the business recording process, so that the electronic records are well organized and can be discovered by a third party. On the other hand it must remain flexible enough, so that the records need not be arranged or labelled in a cumbersome way slowing down operational efficiency and discrediting acceptance. The system must offer solutions to rectify data entry mistakes (data consistency).

Ergonomically, it is significant that the interface between the RMS and the desktop applications be easy to use and transparent. In fact, a fluid integration will stimulate the case workers (action officers) and end users to accept the unavoidable "negative" aspects of records management (discipline, time) as well and helps to stimulate the capture, retrieval and (re)use of the records in day-to-day business in a positive way.

Technically, one of the most important requirements deals with the necessity of a stable, sustainable and explicit structure on behalf of the primary and secondary objects of electronic records management. Metadata (secondary objects), records (primary objects) and functionality of the software must physically (for the first two objects not logically) remain separated in order to be able to respond flexibly to new developments in the company information architecture. Hardware, operation systems, software applications have a much shorter life cycle than the data and records within the systems.

General mandatory requirements for RMS are the 4-digit century format, the possibility of backward compatibility and the availability of extensive product documentation (user guide, on-line help assistant, technical manual, installation procedure). The implementation of identification and authentication means for different roles and user groups (such as records manager, privileged user, usual user, administrator) are necessary. Authorized persons need to have more or less restricted or general access rights to the RM-system, to fulfil those tasks they are entitled to. 

4. Capture and creation of incoming, internal and outgoing records

5. Records indexing, profiling and searching (evidential and information value)

6. Push and pull mechanisms for presentation and communication

7. Storage and life-cycle management

Principal sources:

Design criteria standard for electronic records management software applications (DoD 5015.2-STD), in: David O. Stephens und Roderick C. Wallace, Electronic records retention. New strategies for data life cycle management (Lenexa, 2003) (ARMA publication), Appendix, 101-116

Model requirements for the management of electronic records. MoReq specification (Luxemburg, 2002) (EC publication), also on http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/ida; http://www.dlmforum.eu.org; http://www.cornwell.co.uk/moreq.html.

International standard: information and documentation - records management (Geneva, 2001-2002) (ISO standard 15489-1 und 15489-2)